beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.18 2015고단6970

위증

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 2, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for an attempted crime at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 25, 2015.

On September 18, 2015, the Defendant appeared in the court of Seoul Central District Court No. 522, which was distributed in Seocho-gu Seoul, as a witness of the above court’s “the case of attempted fraud against Defendant C” at the above court’s “2015 Godan 4021, which was the distribution of Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court.” The Defendant was notified of perjury and the right to refuse to testify.

On February 24, 2015, the Defendant introduced a witness to be G in the E store located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul (F in the E store located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul).

In relation to the question "," we asked the author whether he or she is G or not.

It is necessary to give testimony as " and whether the prosecutor's "no witness has been introduced as G".

The answer “A” was the answer, and the answer was C.

The author was fested with A and fested.

“The testimony was made.”

On the other hand, the Defendant continued to the prosecutor’s “in that place, the witness was able to take the victim H in the Defendant’s house, and even if I and her women were to take the birth of I and her women, she paid a lot of money 30,000 h. Unless otherwise, she could not unfold H.

“I do not do so at all on the question “....”

The prosecutor testified as "," and the prosecutor's "Defendant C shall conduct as H, and the F shall conduct an action and state to F.

Twelves no freedom to do so;

The term "domination" means "domination," and the Domination required.

The term "to the question of" does not have any content of such food.

The testimony and testimony were made as follows: “The testimony did not belong to F together with Defendant C, or there was no fact that Defendant C took part in the fraud crime against F.”

However, on February 24, 2015, the Defendant met F in the E store located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D around February 24, 2015, and the Defendant himself.