beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.08.19 2018가단20417

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant from September 25, 2017, as to KRW 2,428,571 and each of the said money to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 10, 2017, D (E) hospitalized in a F Hospital that the Defendant was entrusted by the Jeonju-si to treat the left-hand side of the hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

D At the time of admission into the Defendant Hospital, it was suffering from diseases, such as cerebrovascular, cerebrovascular, left-hand mathy, chronic pressure, urology, urology, gymosis, cardiopulmonary disease, chronic renal disease, stimula, and cardiopulmonary disease, so it was impossible to communicate, and it was almost impossible to communicate.

B. At around 18:00 on September 25, 2017, D was killed in G hospital through G hospital emergency room on the same day at around 22:44 on September 26, 2017, by a nurse C, who was affiliated with the Defendant, without taking safety measures, such as fluoring the hand ties for preventing abortion, which was brought on the left hand of the deceased’s left hand, and caused an accident where he was killed in the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the ground, and was hospitalized in the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the lower part of the river, 2-km surgery, and glusium surgery on the left side of the deceased.

G Hospital issued a medical certificate that D requires approximately seven weeks of medical treatment after the operation.

C. D: (a) on October 21, 2017, when transferred from G hospital to H hospital, and was hospitalized, D died on November 4, 2017 due to the aggravation of cardiopulmonary disease, which had been suffering from the preexisting, due to the extreme decline in telegraph due to the influence of the said surgery.

The Plaintiffs inherited the deceased’s property 1/7 as the children of D (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”).

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 7, each of the titles in subparagraph 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Occurrence of and limitation on liability for damages;

A. According to the above recognition of the liability for damages, the deceased was aged 85 years at the time of the accident, and the deceased suffered from serious climatic diseases, such as brain chronology, high blood pressure, urology, and cardiopulmonary disease, and was in a state of health which is difficult to detect the aftermath of the operation, and the operation of this case is needed.