beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.04.14 2015재고합5 (1)

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal history of the crime] On January 14, 1987, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of 10 months, short of 8 months, short of 10 months, 10 months, 10 years, 1 year of imprisonment with prison labor for a special larceny at the Seoul Criminal District Court on April 11, 1991, 2 years, 3 years, 1 year and 3 years from the Seoul Criminal District Court’s branch branch branch of the Seoul Criminal Court for an attempted special larceny, with prison labor for a specific larceny attempt at the Seoul Criminal Court on April 23, 1993, 1 year, 3 months from the execution of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Incheon Criminal Court’s Branch of the Seoul Criminal Court on February 6, 2003, 20 years and 1 year and 6 months from the imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. at the Central District Court on October 21, 2005.

[2] On December 1, 2013, the Defendant opened a bank which was recorded by a victim D, etc., who used a mixed gap by gathering human wave from a broadcast to a broadcast on the front side of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on December 1, 2013, and then opened a bank to take the victim’s cash 30,000 won, in cash, 30,000 won, in the market price of which there are 1,40,000,000 won and one copy of the CMA card.

They go back.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the defendant (the part of the statement made by the defendant to the effect that the defendant has entered the family register using the victim's tact card);

1. A suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant prepared by the public prosecutor (a part of the statement to the effect that he was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the ruling, and that he was not aware of his card;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each investigation report (the suspect's expected mobile channel, victim's D phone statement hearing, confirmation of convenience store receipts using victim's Ethnop card) and each internal investigation report (the Ethnop card).