beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.10.27 2015고단728

폭행등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 15:35, 2015, committed assault against the victim D, the Defendant reported that the victim D (the age of 56) came to the inside room, and carried the victim D (the age of 56) came to the outside room; (b) carried the victim’s boat with the victim’s left hand to the outside hand; (c) carried the victim’s chest, 4 times the chest with the victim’s chest; and (d) sealed the victim’s chest with the victim’s chest at one time; and (d) sealed the victim with the open door.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. The Defendant damaged the property at the time, place, as described in the above 1. Paragraph (1) above, and caused D to be pushed off the above entrance door by the victim’s sliding of D at the entrance.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed the above entrances owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made against D and B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destruction and damage), the selection of each fine (the fact that the defendant has many criminal records related to violence and commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime). However, it appears that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and committed the crime of this case by mistake, and the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case by contingency, and the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case by contingency. The above victim was agreed with the victim B, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and other various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for an order of provisional payment.