The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Churd vehicle.

On January 15, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 18:00, and led the front road located in Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun D along with a one-lane from a multilateral bombing plane.

There are one lane in which the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, and there is a vehicle in the opposite lane, so that those engaged in driving motor vehicles have the duty of care to observe the center line, to thoroughly control the center line and to thoroughly operate the steering and operating system, and to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering and operating the steering system.

Nevertheless, in order to overtake a pre-motor vehicle, the Defendant, by the negligence of entering the center line and entering the opposite lane, shocked the front part of the part of the GIT 100 U.S. on the part of the victim F (year 76) driving in the opposite opposite lane with the front part of the driver's seat and the front part of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the above victim’s death by occupational negligence at around 18:35 on the same day, due to the rashing of the death at the above place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reports on traffic accidents and reports on occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a written autopsy;

1. A sentence of sentence equivalent to the above is inevitable when considering the following facts: Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the reason for sentencing of imprisonment without prison labor [the scope of recommending punishment] No basic area (8 to 16 months) (the death of a traffic accident) of the type 2 (the death of a traffic accident) (the scope of a special person] [the decision of sentencing] of the Central Line, which caused the death of a victim due to a traffic accident caused by negligence that driven by driving the Central Line, and it is not agreed with the victim. The sentence of sentence corresponding to the above is inevitable. An elderly defendant led to the sentencing prescribed in Article