2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

A. On January 30, 2009, Seoul Central District Court 2008 High Court 2008 High Court 1666, the court rendered a judgment of conviction of a fine of KRW 1.5 million (hereinafter “the judgment of this case”) on the charges of obstruction of performance of official duties on January 30, 2009 (hereinafter “the judgment of this case”) by the Plaintiff’s appeal (Seoul Central District Court 2009No427), and the appeal (Supreme Court 2009No6615) was dismissed in order by the Plaintiff’s appeal (hereinafter “the Seoul Central District Court 2009No6615).

B. On February 24, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Defendant B, C, and Korea, and Defendant B rejected the Plaintiff’s claim on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to support the Plaintiff’s assertion on February 24, 2012, the Plaintiff’s appeal (Seoul Central District Court 2012Na22517) and the appeal (Supreme Court 2012Da82534) were successively dismissed, and the judgment became final and conclusive as it became final and conclusive, on the ground that Defendant B and C directly committed an unlawful act, as the State liable for tort by public officials of the Republic of Korea, jointly and severally.

C. The judgment of this case was rendered against Defendant D and B, which was based on the false statement that Defendant D had been engaged in work near the accident site of this case, and thus, Defendant D and B.