beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.06.15 2017나15684

청구이의

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning to be stated in this part of the basic fact is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as stated in this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. (1) As a relevant legal enforcement document, a notarial deed must specify the amount, quantity, etc. to be paid by the debtor on the deed.

In other words, whether the amount or amount on the certificate is specified, it should be able to be computed from the certificate itself.

A notary public or a member of a joint law office authorized to handle notarial affairs refers to a public document which contains a statement directly heard by himself/herself at the request of the client or his/her client or his/her agent, the intent thereof, and other experimental facts, and thus, is a public document, and thus, Article 327 of the Civil Procedure Act refers to Article 356 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In light of Articles 27, 30, 31, and 38 of the Notary Public Act, which provides that the authenticity of the reported matters shall be presumed to have been presumed to have been established pursuant to paragraph (1), and the procedures, such as confirmation of the client or his/her client and certification of his/her authority of attorney, shall be followed before the preparation of the deed, and after the preparation of the deed, he/she shall be bound to affix his/her signature and seal, and shall not be allowed to deny the probative value without permission and to find facts inconsistent with the statement, unless there

(2) As seen earlier, according to each of the evidence No. 1 and No. 5, the loan certificate of this case is specified as 10% per annum. (3) On June 28, 1994, the loan certificate of this case is specified as 10% per annum. (3) The loan certificate of this case is specified as 10% per annum.