However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant forged an official document with a view to forging and using a dietitian’s license for the purpose of finding a job.

In 209, the Defendant sent approximately KRW 30,00 to the vegetable dyer with a false online site, and requested the production of a forged dietitian license. At around that time, the Defendant’s face pictures and qualification certificates: B; “B; classification of qualifications: dietitian’s license; name A; “Life Day”; and “The Minister of Health and Welfare for February 17, 2006,” and then sent it to the Defendant at that time.

As a result, the defendant, in collusion with a person who forged a false document, forged a dietitian license issued by the Minister of Health and Welfare, which is a public document, without authority, for the purpose of exercising his/her authority.

2. On August 2017, the Defendant: (a) submitted a forged dietitian’s license as if he were issued genuinely, as stated in the preceding paragraph, to the E Hospital located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Cheongju-si, which was requested by its staff members to verify his eligibility to employ a dietitian as a dietitian; and (b) exercised the forged official document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. G private statement;

1. A false dietitian's license copy;

1. Application of the answer statutes requesting the verification of passing a license examination for dietitians;

1. Relevant Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Articles 225 and 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 229 of the Criminal Act (a point of uttering of forged official document), and the choice of imprisonment with labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The basic area (from August to two years) of the sentencing criteria (the scope of recommended punishment) [the person who has no special sentencing factors] of the type 1, including forgery, alteration, etc. of official documents, etc.;

2. The following sentence shall be rendered: