정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Utilization (Defamation) of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (hereinafter “Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection Act”) by posting a false statement on information and communications networks, such as the Newanan Military Administration, the Bapo Police Station, and the homepage of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, etc., on five occasions as follows, for the purpose of slandering the police officers I belonging to the Newan Military E, E, and E, who were sentenced to the instructions of C and D, by revealing
Victim 1 1 201/06/10 00/26, 00: the Internet homepage (htt:/www.w.s.go.r/) of the Newanth Military Station “JPC bank” (htt:/www.hinan.go/) [Attachment 1] 201/06/19/20: the Internet homepage (httt://www.go.go.go.m./) of the Newan Military Office of Korea and the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office of Prosecutors’ Office (htttt:/www.go.go./) (httt://www.go. S. S.go./) 2,2-1 E. 3201/01/06/29/13, and the Internet homepage of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office (htt/mp.M./N.//H. 200/H./ 17.go.///200.go.
2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) around 00:26, Jun. 10, 201, entered the name and resident registration number in order to post a letter on the Internet bulletin board of the new Military Service website; (b) a defect that requires the real name certification by using the name and resident registration number; (c) a defect that requires the real name certification; and (d) the name and resident registration number of K known to D, obtained the real name certification and posted a letter as described in paragraph (1) No. 1 in the name of K, and then used the other person’s resident registration number more than five times from that time until August 22, 2011, as described in paragraph (1).
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's statement in court;