약정금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
purport.
1. The defendant's ground of appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the defendant's argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the defendant presented additional evidence to this
Therefore, the reasoning of this court is as follows, except for the addition or dismissal under Paragraph (2) below.
(The main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). 2. 3. 14-15 of the judgment of the first instance court "A 4-15 of the third 14-15 of the judgment "A 15, 15, 17, 19 through 23, 27, 28, 32 and 33 of the evidence A, Eul 2, 3 and 4, and the purport of "A 4-15 of the judgment of the first instance court" shall be stated as "the whole purport of testimony and arguments of E by witnesses of the first instance court."
The third half to fourth half of the judgment of the first instance are as follows. "No one shall go to or accept only the facts recognized in the preceding."
It is insufficient to view that the Plaintiff affixed the Defendant’s official seal on the financial weekly fee agreement contrary to the Defendant’s intent, solely based on the facts acknowledged earlier and the remaining evidence submitted by the Defendant up to this court, that the testimony of the witness J of this court was difficult to believe, and that the Defendant’s official seal was affixed to the Defendant’s
The Defendant’s assertion is unacceptable. The following is added between April 15 and 16 of the judgment of the first instance.
“K” (which appears to indicate the plaintiff) in the Financial Week Fee Agreement.
The letter "" is published and the defendant's official seal is combined, so it seems that both the plaintiff and the defendant verify the unity of the agreement of the Financial Week Fee, and it seems that the plaintiff and the defendant did not affix their seals in light of the preparation practices of the agreement of the Financial Week Fee Fee in the records and arguments.
Furthermore, the defendant asserts that there is no name and seal or signature of the defendant representative director in the financial weekly fee agreement, but the phrase "written name" is written, as well as the rubber seal.