When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 3, 2017, the Defendant damaged the said taxi in order to take the right side of the said taxi at one time, by walking the 437,779 won at one time, on the ground that the said taxi does not turn on the road in front of the Gumi-si, Seoul, and the D taxi operated by the injured party B (52) on the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Reports on internal investigation (Attachment, etc. of photographs of damaged vehicles) and reports on internal investigation (in addition, with regard to the addition of damaged parts);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (a quotation attached due to damage to a taxi blicker), an investigation report (a photographed by cutting off a black blick image) (a photograph attached thereto);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. All circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 32(1)3 and Article 25(3)3 (a) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Litigation, etc. of Application for Compensation, has a record of being punished twice by a fine for violent crimes in 2015, the fact that the defendant is seriously against the defendant, the fact that the amount of damage is not large, and the amount of damage was agreed with the victim, etc.