If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On July 3, 2008, the Defendant, without authority, stated that “I will see all the acts committed by the 1960 share use points, or any or all periods of time during the 1960 presidential exhibition C house, I will live in the future. I will now live in the future. I signed D’s seal which was received from D in advance to prepare a written agreement on the side of D’s name, and signed D’s seal which was held by D in advance, and “I will make efforts to further promote the opposition between the head of the Shim. (D) with a gold team’s face-to-face, and at the time of non-performance of all the matters, I will have no objection to disregarding the withdrawal of compulsory auction and affix D’s name.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged each of the D’s compliance instruments and franchise on July 3, 2008 in the name of the private document related to rights and obligations.

B. On July 8, 2008, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant, without authority, made a lux with a lux, using a lux in blank, stating that “I have lost the luxity of lux and living together with the luxar who had become aware of lux,” and then voluntarily withdraw a disposition of compulsory auction from luxin by legally attaching a certificate of the personal seal impression, but I would like to see the Defendant’s lux and in the future suspended from office.” On July 8, 2008, the Defendant put a DNA seal carried in advance on D’s name.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged the case pledge on July 8, 2008, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and a copy of the statement of a person, respectively.

2. Around July 8, 2009, the Defendant submitted a written response to the instant case of demurrer to the Daejeon District Court Branch of Daejeon District Court Decision 2009Gahap2821, and submitted each of the above false documents under the above D as if they were the document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1..