2. The judgment is favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and against himself, that the motor device of the defendant's bicycle is subscribed to liability insurance, that the defendant has a disability to the defendant, and that there is no economic condition as a basic livelihood supplier.

On the other hand, the defendant has been punished several times due to traffic-related crimes, such as unlicensed driving, etc., and this case is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant paid a traffic accident while driving in violation of the signal with no license, and that the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim.

It is difficult to view that the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable in light of the above circumstances and other conditions of sentencing indicated in the record, such as Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.