beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.02.14 2018나3650

임금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Defendant did not pay the remaining wages after having employed and work with the Plaintiff and C in each of the following works and paying only part of the two persons’ wages.

(1) From among construction works for improving the roof of a building located in D (owner E) during the end of April 2015, 2015, the amount of 2.5 million won out of the wage of 3 million won is unpaid (2.4 million won out of the wage of 2.4 million won in the prefabricated-type steel panel construction works located in F during the end of September 2016, the amount of 1.460,000 won out of the wage of 1.5 million won out of the wage of 1.5 million won in construction works, such as a warehouse, shower room, toilet room, etc. located in G at the end of September 2016, the amount of 5,000 won out of the wage of 1.5 million won out of the wage of 1.5 million won out of the wage of 1.88,000 won in the construction works for constructing a 1st floor house located in G on September 20,

B. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the total amount of 5.3 million won (=2.5 million won per 1.6 million won per 5.6 million won per 5.6 million won) and damages for delay.

2. It is not sufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant employed the Plaintiff and C and provided them with labor, but did not pay all the agreed wage to the Plaintiff, etc., solely on the basis of the written evidence of evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.