beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.04.01 2016고정689

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, under the trade name of “B”, is in a competitive business relationship with D operated by the victim C, and both B and D are operated by the Korea Art Services Corporation, and if the customer using the 114 telephone number guidance calls for providing information on the phone numbers of a specific type of business that he/she is aware of the trade name, giving priority to providing the company’s telephone numbers that he/she has joined the 114 telephone number guidance, thereby raising the public relations effect on the business.

14 With respect to each line subscribed to the 114 preferential guidance, user fees for three months shall be paid in advance, and if delayed payment is made, the right to subscribe shall be cancelled.

shall be admitted to the Commission.

On June 3, 2014, the Defendant called on the phone number of 114 telephone numbers from the French area of Busan (E) around 16:58, and sought D's numbers operated by the victim.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intention to find the leased company, and merely took the D's 114 preferential guidance service order, and received D's number guidance for the purpose of getting the Defendant's 114 preferential guidance service order operated by the Defendant.

Defendant 1, as seen above, led to the exhaustion of D’s 114 preferential guidance service order operated by the injured party by inserting a single-person’s “low-water call” and the same year starting around that time.

7. From 12. up to 12. up to 470 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet, by making phone calls via KT 114 telephone numbers and extinguishing D's order of 114 preferential guidance service by receiving D's numbers and giving guidance, other unspecified customers are prevented from receiving D's numbers through 114 preferential guidance service, thereby hindering the victim's primary business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police officer against C.