The lower court, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, found the Defendant guilty of injury by robbery among the facts charged in the instant case.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower court and the first instance court in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on robbery, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, considering the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, the court below is just in rejecting the defendant's assertion on mental disorder, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as to mental disorder.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.