However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a low-priced vehicle B.

Around 17:55 on February 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven the said car as a business; (b) driven the said car at a two-lane 21.4 km point (unclaimed Myeon) on the west-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-n (Unclaimed Myeon) in the front-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-nick-ri-nicking the two-lane Myeon; (c) was inevitably changed from the two-lanes to the one-lane Myeon-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri (hereinafter referred to as the “nuran-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri) without using the two-lane Myeon-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri) to take; (d 3).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry of each written statement (simplified traffic) in E and C preparation;

1. Each description of a traffic accident report, a actual condition survey report, and a written diagnosis (F hospital), and a written estimate;

1. Application of each image statute of traffic accident evidence and photograph;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime committed by the pertinent Article;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigations under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (Consideration of circumstances described below):

1. The reasoning of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is as follows.