If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On August 4, 2015, at around 18:30 on August 4, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s left side her at one time by taking away flapsing away from the Defendant’s horse that the Defendant would not pay the full daily allowances while talking about the issue of the victim D (20 years of age) and daily payment by the Defendant’s horse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on October 11, 2013 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. was a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a deadly weapons, injury, etc.), and the Defendant committed the instant crime again without being aware of it during the period of probation, even though he/she had been punished for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a deadly weapons, etc.), it is reasonable to strictly punish the Defendant in light of the fact that he/she committed the instant crime without being aware of it during the period of probation, and that he/she did not recover from damage. However, considering the fact that the Defendant recognized the facts of the instant crime, he/she is against the Defendant, the Defendant’s favorable circumstances should be taken