2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Consolidated Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Paragraph 34,980,00 won was paid to the defendant after the judgment of the court of first instance, and Section 2-B was delivered.

The grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance other than the dismissal under the following paragraph (2) are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Each statement and image of Gap 2 through 5, 10 through 15, witness F of the first instance trial, and witness G of the trial party alone are insufficient to recognize that there was an agreement to install individual so that the parking facilities of this case can have entered the parking facilities of this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that there was an agreement to install individual so that the parking facilities of this case can have entered the parking facilities of this case. In full view of the entries and image of Eul 1 through 7, the defendant was requested by the plaintiff to estimate the parking facilities of this case on April 201, and the plaintiff was not able to accommodate the above parking facilities of this case by marking the parking facilities of this case, parking facilities that can accommodate the above parking facilities of this case, parking facilities that can accommodate the above parking facilities of this case, parking facilities of this case which are classified as RaV/SUV vehicles as parking facilities according to the design distance of each parking facilities of this case, and the defendant could not accept the above parking facilities of this case with the design of this case of this case 4th GUV facilities separately from the design parking facilities of this case.