A. The Plaintiff is a company running non-life insurance business, such as fire insurance, and entered into a fire insurance contract with G running the 2nd and fourth floor of the building located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul and the 5th underground floor of the 2nd and fourth floor of the building (hereinafter “the building in this case”) with G running the 2nd and fourth floor of the 2nd and fourth floor of the 2nd and fourth floor of the 2nd and fourth floor of the building (hereinafter “F”). The Defendants are G employees. (b) The occurrence of the insurance accident and the payment of insurance money, etc.) In order to reinforce the string of the 4th floor mechanical room of the building in this case to support the string and cutting of the 16th and fourth floor of the building in this case, and the 20th and fourth floor of the 4th floor of the building in this case (hereinafter “the fire in this case”).

(B) The Plaintiff asserted that a fire was caused by a fire, which was located on the floor of the machine room (the Plaintiff alleged that the fire was caused by a fire, but it is not sufficient to recognize only the description of evidence No. 3, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(2) On December 29, 2014, the Plaintiff paid KRW 89,57,807, respectively, totaling KRW 3,002,00, and KRW 86,575,807, to G on December 30, 2014 due to the instant fire.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without a partial dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, Gap evidence No. 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. Although the Defendants asserted that they had been engaged in the operation of a safety device for fire prevention in advance, they neglected to do so and caused the instant fire, so they are liable to compensate each party G as joint tortfeasor for the total damages caused by the instant fire. However, the Plaintiff, the insurer, etc. is liable to compensate for the entire damages caused by the instant fire.