When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 26, 2012, the Defendant drafted a written agreement between the victim G in the case of embezzlement, etc. against E and F (Seoul District Court 201Da6444, Daegu District Court 201) at the D's office located in Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant: (a) had the head of the office of the said attorney-at-law office H pay the full amount of KRW 56 million on the date of the agreement to pay the full amount of KRW 23 million on the date of the agreement; and (b) had the Defendant and the Defendant guarantee the payment of KRW 33,00,000,000 in the remainder of the agreement to the remainder of KRW 33,00,000,000,000,000,000 won; (c) written statement of payment to the effect that the Defendant and the Defendant guaranteed the payment to the Defendant; and (d) had the name named "I" as "I" and affixed an official seal next to it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of payment in the name of I, a private document concerning rights and obligations without authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to G and E;

1. A reply for the I Civil Procedure (2013 group 5567 contract amount, etc.);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the Letter of Payment

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act and Article 231 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;