Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine.

Defendant

B around September 21, 2014, around 21:15, around 21:15, the Defendant was waiting to lend a passenger car to Defendant A. However, the victim E (Nam, 36 years of age) was satisfing Defendant B’s math by satching Defendant B’s her head with his her satch, thereby having a intention to fight if she met with his her head, which led to a conflict with the victim E.

At this time, Defendant A observed this and walked about 10 times the body part of the victim E, which the victim E was able to walk, and the victim E was able to walked about 10 times.

Accordingly, Defendant B deducted the recipient of street trees in near the wife, and b took one time the side of the victim E, etc., and the victim E, who was the wife of the victim E, b. 34 years old.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put about two weeks of medical treatment to victims E, and inflicted injury on the victim F, such as the left-hand side and the finger in need of two weeks of medical treatment to the victim F, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each statement made by the police officer in relation to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the grounds of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act.