2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

The defendant is the studio of Seo-gu, Gwangju.

On June 1, 2016, at around 20:30 on June 20, 2016, the Defendant made a communication to the effect that the victim C (one, two years of age, and two years of age) living in the above room room in front of the above room room had been forgotten with the victim’s mother.

During that, the above victim came to contact with her mother and came to know of the house password, and the defendant changed to the house, and the defendant changed to the victim's studio rooftop.

In addition, while the above defendant talks about the male-friendly room of the victim and the victim, the victim stated that "I am hye-gu and § ba-a-gu, I am hye-gu, several male hye-gu and several times hye-gu, I am hye-hye-gu, I am hye-hye-hye-kye-hye-hye-hy, I am hye-hye-hye-kye-kye-ky

Accordingly, the defendant committed indecent acts by force against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of statement by the police of the victim who has made a court statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (related to the appraisal report of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation);

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Article 47(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from an order to disclose or notify, the proviso to Article 49(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, the accused’s wrong recognition and reflects his/her wrong recognition, and the accused’s age, family environment and social ties, records, details and motive of the