However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 22, 2015, at around 00:10 on March 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents at the street side of the Amond Park, Amond Park, and sent to the site, and (b) was aware of the case circumstances by the C police box affiliated with the 3 patrol team affiliated with the C police box of the C police box, and the C police box E, who was a driver, tried to accompany the police box to a police box for the measurement of drinking alcohol, and was able to accompany the police box to a police box for the measurement of drinking alcohol; and (c) was under surveillance by many unspecified citizens, such as G around the police officer, etc., and was under surveillance by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's defendant's desire to commit the crime of this case should be pronounced not guilty because it is not unlawful because he expressed his desire to do so to the police officials in the process of resisting their illegal voluntary behavior.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the following evidence, i.e., victim E, a police official, consistently with this court from the investigative agency to this court, E, etc. had expressed that the defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender on the wind that the defendant continuously takes a desire, despite warning several times of the defendant, in the process of carrying the female at the police station with the consent of F who drives the vehicle under the influence of alcohol as the defendant's daily behavior, and the defendant stated that the defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender at the same time. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20340, Feb. 3, 2008> another police official D, and the drinking driving, in the case of the driver's own, the police official requested voluntary behavior of the defendant as it did not need to request voluntary behavior, and at the time, he stated that the defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender after giving him a warning several times, and that he was also witness G.