When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant around 07:30 on April 1, 2015, the victim D(36 years of age) who is the driver of C Motor Vehicle, is driving two lanes in front of the Myeon-ro 14, Gwangju Northern-ro, Myeon-ro, Myeon-ro, 14 years of age.

In addition, it was assaulted by the victim's body who was seated on the driver's seat one time and boomed from the driver's seat on the ground that he she sawd with a driver's seat by cutting in one-lane, flaging the driver's body of the victim who gets off the driver's seat with his driver's seat, and boomed the driver's body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of D's written statements to statutes;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Optional fine;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act seems to be contrary to the instant crime and to make it economically difficult for the Defendant to commit the instant crime. However, there is an enemy who was punished as the instant crime or assault in the past, even if there are some circumstances to consider the background of the instant crime, such circumstance appears to have already been reflected in the summary order, and the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order cannot be deemed to have been imposed in light of equity with similar cases, etc.