except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On February 2, 2010, the Defendant, at the home of the Defendant located in G of the wife population in Seocho-si, for the purpose of exercising the right, stated in the form of a real estate lease contract that “the location of the Defendant,” “the wife population C (16 Dong 16),” “one million won in the column of deposit,” “one million won in the rent column,” “one hundred thousand won in the rent column,” and “D” in the lessor column, and placed a seal purchased by the Defendant on his/her own request to the seal business operator on his/her name.

Accordingly, the defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease contract in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On February 18, 2010, the Defendant, at the home of the above Defendant’s above Defendant’s office, stated the following as “G” in the location column of the location of the location using the inspection tool on the paper of the real estate lease contract using the inspection tool in Gyeonggi-do, “Seoul-do,” “one-story, one-story,” “one-story, 40,000 won in the deposit column,” “one-yearly, 40,000 won in the rent column,” “in the rent column, 40,000 won in each day” in the special agreement column, “the money for the deposit when there is a change in the deposit amount shall be returned to FC and under the presence of FC,” on the date of preparation, indicated “G” as “F on February 7, 2010,” and affixed a seal purchased by the Defendant to the lessor’s official seal affixed to that name.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease contract in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. On February 8, 2010, the Defendant borrowed KRW 10 million from F in front of the public bath of H “H” in Ansan-si, and exercised the real estate lease contract under the above forged name as a collateral, as if it was duly formed with the completion of the contract.

B. Around February 18, 2010, the Defendant issued an additional security to F, at the home of the above Defendant, not aware of the forgery set forth in paragraph 1-B.