1. As to the ground of appeal No. 1, based on the record, the lower court acknowledged the following facts: (a) the prosecution attended the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office on December 14, 2014 and December 16, 2014; and (b) received output of e-mail from the Defendant in the form of voluntary presented evidence from the Defendant; (c) the Defendant was asked from the prosecutor’s office whether the Defendant was able to submit e-mail (G-mail; hereinafter referred to as “H”) between the Defendant and H (hereinafter referred to as “H”); (d) by accessing the Internet, entering the e-mail ID and password, and reading the e-mail; and (e) submitted it to the prosecutor’s office by printing out the contents of the e-mail; (b) the Defendant “to submit the content of e-mail at the free will”; and (c) it was difficult to recognize the Defendant’s voluntary submission of the consent to access e-mail and the content of e-mail presented to the prosecutor’s office without any legitimate contact.

In addition, the lower court.