However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 23, 2016, from around 21:00 to 21:40 the same day, the Defendant, who interfered with his/her duties, tried to combine with two customers who had been engaged in drinking alcohol on the table table with the victim C (at the age of 58) in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and with two customers who had been engaged in drinking alcohol on the table table under the influence of alcohol.

In the event of a person suffering damage, “Na Taekwondo Bakn”

One-line Shep Sheb, and the Si expenses are carried, and the victim was able to avoid a disturbance for about 40 minutes by putting a sexual speech with "wek Sheet" and making a brut while speaking.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised force and interfered with the victim's main business.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the front of the head of the above head office in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 21:50 on the 23. 02. 2016. Around the 1. 1., the Defendant: (a) recommended the head of the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Police Station D District Sticker E, who was called up after receiving 112 reports due to interference with the duties referred to in the above 1. 3., recommended the Defendant to sound up and return home, with the Defendant’s personal belongings and strings; and (b) assaulted the above E’s left face at one time on the ground side.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the execution of duties concerning the report processing of E who is a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A police statement of C and F;

1. Application of evidence photographs and Acts and subordinate statutes on the victim of violence;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the obstruction of business, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the favorable circumstances as shown below)

1. Scope of sentencing recommended according to the sentencing criteria;

A. The obstruction of business [the scope of recommended punishment] is one type (Interference with business) and the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person who is subject to special sentencing).