2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. On February 5, 1966, Non-party E and Non-party E reported marriage with Defendant E, and under the chain, Defendant F, G, H, and Non-Party J.

B. The Network I died on November 7, 2014.

C. The deceased J died on February 7, 1999.

The Network J reported the marriage on January 7, 1994 with Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B, C, and D as their children.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' grounds for the plaintiffs' claims are that the deceased I owned the property exceeding one billion won before the birth, but all of them were donated to the defendants, and the plaintiffs, who are damp inheritors, did not receive proper inheritance, were infringed on legal reserve of inheritance. Thus, the defendants jointly claim to the purport that they have a duty to pay 30,000,000 won and damages for delay to each of them, as the amount corresponding to the legal reserve of inheritance portion.

3. Therefore, the plaintiffs' above assertion based on this premise is without merit, inasmuch as there is no evidence to support that the deceased and the deceased I owned property exceeding one billion won prior to their birth, but all of them were donated to the defendants.

4. In conclusion, each claim against the Defendants by the Plaintiffs against the Defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.