However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 6, 2013, around 00:15, the Defendant: (a) reported his/her employees E on his/her body and body fighting at a “D” restaurant located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon; and (b) reported his/her fighting to the police; (c) the victim F-owned market price at the same time exceeded KRW 70,000,000, and damaged approximately 10,000,000,000 won at the market price at that time.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) caused by force to interfere with the restaurant business of the Victim F by cutting the customers who had 40 minutes of a meal at the same place, such as breaking the fluor’s disease at the same time and place; (b) placing the fluor’s disease to E; and (c) taking the fluor’s fluor’s fluor, picking the fluor’s wound, taking the fluor’

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 366 and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (No person shall have been sentenced to recovery of damage, punishment

1. An order to attend a lecture: Article 62-2 (4 times of Fine for Violence)