However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 27, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Busan District Court's Branch on May 27, 2008, and a fine of three million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the above court on July 28, 2008, and a fine of three million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Central District Court on June 15, 201.

On October 26, 2013, around 23:50 on October 26, 2013, the Defendant driven B knche vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.070% without a driver’s license from the front of the restaurant of “bank trees” from Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the road of approximately 2km to the front of the 1103 Dae-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who had driven a motor vehicle on more than two occasions, was driving the motor vehicle without a driver's license under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on criminal records, etc.;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (2) 1, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment imposed for a violation of the Road Traffic Act heavier than that of a punishment);

1. Selection of an alternative imprisonment with prison labor (including not only the past record of driving on the market, but also the past record of being punished by a fine for driving on three occasions before 2006, and the fact that a person does not comply with measurement at the time of drinking control and runs away;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation ( Taking into consideration the fact that the defendant reflects his/her wrong conduct and that he/she has no record of punishment of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment for the same kind of crime);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason of not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;