약정금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is that "it shall not be deemed as a direct disposition document concerning the settlement agreement alleged by the plaintiff" in Part 6 of Part 2 of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, "it shall not be deemed as a direct disposition document concerning the settlement agreement alleged by the plaintiff. However, it may be viewed that the existence of the underlying relationship with the promissorysory note can be proved, and as seen below, it is difficult to view the underlying relationship of the above promissory note as a settlement agreement of February 14, 2008 alleged by the plaintiff, and therefore, it is difficult to accept the plaintiff's above assertion." Since the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the deletion of the part from Part 6, Chapters 21 through 7, and 13 as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the
2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.
The judgment of the first instance court is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.