2. The following facts are favorable: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime, and the Defendant deposited KRW 2 million for the victim; and (b) the instant crime is in the relationship between the crime of injury, etc. for which judgment has become final and conclusive, and the crime of this case is one of the concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act; and (c) the equity with the case where judgment

However, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant by assaulting the victim in a de facto marital relationship by taking the head debt of the victim, taking the balth, pushing the head into a toilet, taking the balth, taking the head into a bath, and taking over the balthic face, etc., and causing injury to the victim, such as cryp, tensions, tensions, etc., which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment. In light of the form of the act and degree of injury, etc., the crime is not very good. The Defendant committed repeatedly violence-related crimes against the victim during a considerable period prior to the crime of this case. In particular, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim during a considerable period of time from February 27, 2015 to August 27, 2015, and the Defendant was indicted for investigation with the victim, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a limited term of up to 10 years on the following grounds: the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for injury to the victim; and the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for more than 215 years.

In addition to the above circumstances, the records and arguments of this case, such as the result of the judgment before the judgment of the protection observation office, and the age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, are revealed.