공무집행방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around December 7, 2016, at the front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (a) had many citizens, such as E, who were sent back to the police station C police station in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, who was under the influence of alcohol and was able to return home from D in the background of the victim of the police station affiliated with the police station C police station in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, who was sent to the police station after receiving a report of 112.
“At least several times the desire,” etc.
Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.
2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time, place specified in Paragraph 1, and assaulted D’s chests, which were sent back to the Defendant on his hand, such as the time and place where the Defendant was able to return home.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to 112 report processing.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written E;
1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. In light of the fact that a police officer, who takes advantage of the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, took a bath and assault against a police officer who takes advantage of the reason for sentencing, and had the same criminal records of the same kind, the crime is not good. However, there is no criminal record other than the punishment imposed twice by fine, the degree of assault is not excessive, and other circumstances such as motive, means and consequence of the crime, after the crime, etc., the punishment is determined as ordered by the disposition