1. On February 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) filed a request for the analysis of a mobile phone secured as above with “E”, a data recovery company located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan DD Building 502, while the Defendant was in possession of the husband and the victim C, who was in possession of a white boomer’s possession and brought to the house in Incheon, which was a husband (in the course of a divorce lawsuit, during the process of the divorce lawsuit). On February 26, 2016, the Defendant recovered the telephone records and text deleted from the relevant mobile phone.

Accordingly, the defendant recognized the contents of the victim's cell phone using the technical means of the victim's cell phone, thereby infringing the victim's secret.

2. The Defendant of defamation: “I (name after the victim’s name) dies in the F apartment guard room in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 2016;

The female, who was removed from money in Korea, went away, and the husband in Korea and the woman who was winded.

However, the defendant did not lend money to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim's reputation by openly pointing out the false facts about the victim to the security guards managing the above apartment.

3. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall access any electronic financial infrastructure by a person who has no access authority;

On July 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) discovered two copies of the insurance claim under H’s name in the process of arranging the husband’s animals; and (b) attempted to engage in phone banking through a telephone call (J) installed at his mother’s place of residence on July 13, 2016; and (c) failed to inquire into the account details due to an error of entry in the password two occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to access the electronic financial infrastructure without access authority, but did not achieve that purpose.