At around 03:00 on May 14, 2019, the Defendant refused to lend money to the victim within the room room operated by the victim C, which was operated by the victim C at Jeju-si, and thereby interfered with the victim’s main business by force for about 40 minutes, such as: (a) he fluening the victim’s fluencing of money; (b) “Iskh knbh knbb knbbbb knb knb knb knb knb knb knb knb knb knb knb knb knb knb knb knb knb.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement in C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of a loss (Interference with business), on-site photographs, 112 reporteries, investigation reports (clock reports, such as circumstances of damage

1. The crime of this case, on the grounds of the pertinent Article of the relevant criminal facts, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and the reason for sentencing of imprisonment, is that the crime of this case lending money from the main place of business to the owner of the business, but the rejection of the sentence, thereby obstructing the main business by force, such as cutting off the tebbbbbbbs by cutting off the tebs on the tebs, thereby obstructing the main business by force. As such, the crime is bad, and the defendant had a record of punishment several times due to violent crimes, and in particular, on August 8, 2018, he/she was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and 2 years of suspension of execution at the Jeju District Court, and on August 17, 2018, which became final and conclusive and is still under suspension of execution, it is disadvantageous

However, there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized facts charged and that the defendant agreed with the victim.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, means and results of crimes, and the circumstances after crimes shall be determined as ordered by taking into account various sentencing conditions shown in the trial process of this case.

[Sentencing Criteria] - Interference with Business: Interference with Business; Interference with Business