2. Considering the fact that the defendant reflects the judgment, that the damage is minor, and that the damaged goods were returned to the victim, but considering the fact that the defendant again committed a crime during the period of repeated crimes even though he/she had several criminal records of the same kind of crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.