However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From January 18, 2013 to November 11:30 of the same month, the Defendant operated a game room with the trade name of “D” on the 1st, Dong-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, by providing customers with game products according to the contents as classified by the Game Rating Board, and provided 100 game products, which are the game products classified by the Game Rating Board, were installed and provided for use of game products different from the contents of the rating classification by providing the game products, which are different from the contents of the rating classification, by using external storage devices (USB) in the above game machine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. A written statement of F and E;

1. Statement of police seizure;

1. Review of the result of enforcement support;

1. Investigation report (control details, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing enforcement photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the facts constituting a crime and subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and Promotion of Game Industry;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the first offender and the fact that the period of business has not expired);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defense counsel on the assertion of the defense counsel under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry provides that "the defendant provided game products, the contents of which are different from the contents of the classification, by using external storage devices (USB) in the game machine installed without providing the game products to customers as classified by the Game Rating Board, and provides them for use of the game products, the contents of which are modified in an irregular manner." Thus, the defendant asserts to the purport that the prosecution is unlawful because the contents of the classification and the defendant's provision of the game software for business use altered by any method are not specified.

According to each evidence of the judgment, the game of this case is s.C.