However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the father and father of victimized children C (n, 17 years of age), D (n, 10 years of age).

On November 30, 2016, around 22:40 on November 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) taken the cell phone of C in front of the victimized child D for the reason that the victimized child C, who was drunk and was drunk, was not well able to answer; (b) taken the phone of C to the male-child group of C, and received the phone from C to the male-child group of C, and (c) taken the phone of C, “I

The Cranch telephone will be the last time.

"At the same time, the mobile phone seems to pose a threat to C's head.

The Defendant continued to see the left from the floor before the victimized child D and threaten the victimized child C as if they were to have been in mind, and the Defendant must die of the same year as the h, h, and p, for the same year.

m. How the same year of width will expire.

On the basis of the knowledge of this, it was not possible to see when it was in Qatter.

"Along with the plucking of C as a brush for the main use of the drinking brush, and then threaten C with the brush of the brush on the floor, and threaten C's vessels by plucking it, etc., the victimized children C were engaged in emotional abuse for about one hour. At the same time, all these are observed, thereby causing D's fears to the victimized children.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 71 (1) 2 and Article 17 subparagraph 5 of the Child Uniforms Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 8(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Child Abuse Offenses, etc., shall be determined in consideration of the following circumstances, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered by the order;

The favorable circumstances: The defendant has no record of criminal punishment after he/she was sentenced to several fines by the time of 2008: He/she recognizes each crime and reflects each crime, and after he/she was sentenced to the punishment by the time of 2008: He/she has made several statements before the