However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On February 8, 2018, around 23:28, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on the roadside in front of the “D” convenience store located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul. The Defendant “F (55 years old) for the police officer belonging to the Seoul Seongbuk Police Station E District, dispatched upon receipt of a report 112, is so short as to be seen.

In order for the Defendant to witness G (54 years old) who is a police officer belonging to the same district unit where the victim F was dispatched and dealt with another case after receiving another 112 report in the vicinity of the end, and to prevent the Defendant from committing assaulting the police officer who is working on the part of the same district unit, on the ground that the Defendant was broken on the part of the Defendant on the ground that he was broken on the part of the said F, and walked about three times by a vice of the said F’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f

“I am the police side” to the above G. G.

At the same time, the G was assaulted by the said G by walking approximately three times on the part of her mouth with his/her mouth.

As a result, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of their duties on crime prevention and investigation and at the same time injured the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged police officers;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence include assault against police officers who intend to help the defendant himself/herself, and thus, the case is light due to the injury inflicted by police officers.

subsection (b) of this section.

However, the defendant is in depth against the defendant when committing the crime of this case.

In other words, such crimes are committed.