However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car of D amount.

On April 16, 2016, the defendant, around 07:20 on April 16, 2016, continued to turn to the left in the direction of the parallel of Yong-dong-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City at the intersection of the 102-odle distance from the boundary of the sular road to the sexually investigative distance.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver has a duty of care to accurately operate steering devices and brakes for those engaged in driving service and prevent accidents by driving safely according to signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused a rapid left turn in violation of the signal while he was a yellow signal, and caused by occupational negligence that failed to accurately operate the steering gear and brake system, and caused a pedestrian signal device installed on the right side of the moving direction to the left by the above amount of a light car.

Ultimately, the Defendant sustained injury to the victim E (the 30-year-old) who was on the top of the passenger car operation at the above amount due to the occupational negligence as seen above, during the course of suffering from an injury, such as a prop-off and transfusion, which requires at least four months of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A third-time protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. The comprehensive traffic accident analysis report, each gene appraisal report, and the legal and chemical appraisal report;

1. Each internal investigation report and investigation report (including each accompanying material);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates, medical opinions in charge;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following factors shall be considered in favor of the defendant among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the grounds of the order to provide community service and attend lectures arose from the negligence of the defendant who violated the signal, and the victim of the same person is future.