Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The defendant's wrong determination on the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is against his own mistake, etc. However, this case constitutes a case where the defendant under the Road Traffic Act is severely punished as a consequence of driving under the influence of alcohol more than twice even though he was punished for a drunk driving, and the defendant has already been punished for a total of eight times due to a total of eight times or a suspended sentence due to a drunk driving or aless driving, which is inevitable at this time, and the sentence is inevitable at this time. The court below sentenced a sentence of discretionary mitigation after selecting imprisonment. The court below imposed a sentence of discretionary mitigation, and taking account of the defendant's age, occupation, health, personality and behavior, personality and environment, home environment, background of the crime, blood alcohol concentration level, driving distance, and circumstances before and after the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, occupation, health, and family