(a) Project approval and publication - Urban planning facility project (the project of this case) (the project of this case)

[Public Notice] - Public Notice: The Defendant: Notice No. 2009-75 of the Yangju-si on June 11, 2009

(b) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on July 13, 2017 (hereinafter “instant ruling of expropriation”): 152-68 square meters of land for 1,254 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”): The date of expropriation: September 5, 2017 - Totaling KRW 345,726,600, - An appraisal corporation: A future appraisal corporation for a stock company, and an appraisal corporation for a stock company (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”).

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on March 22, 2018 (hereinafter “instant objection”) - Compensation for losses: Totaling KRW 354,007,800.

D. The court’s appraisal result (hereinafter “court’s appraisal”) - The appraised value: Total of KRW 362,970,200.

E. On August 16, 2017, the Defendant made the Plaintiff as the principal deposit, and deposited the amount of KRW 8,281,200 as compensation for losses under the adjudication of expropriation, and KRW 345,726,60 on April 17, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1, 4 and 5 (including branch numbers), the appraiser Gap's appraisal result, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The comparative standard for compensating for losses to the land of this case is 416-51, 271, 271, 271, 30, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 41, 41, 41, 41, 41, 41, 41, 41, 41, 300, 300, 3000, 300

B. (1) Determination 1) Whether the selection of comparative standard sites is illegal or not is set forth in the adjudication of acceptance and objection in the lawsuit for increase.