성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (6 months of imprisonment, 40 hours of order to complete the course, 2 years of disclosure or notification order) is too unreasonable.
2. Although the Defendant had a record of multiple punishments (one-time punishment, one-time suspension of the execution of imprisonment, and two-time suspension of the execution of the sentence) for the same crime and has been sentenced to dismissal of the prosecution due to the revocation of the complaint, the Defendant committed the instant crime that commits an indecent act on the victim in the public bath water room, the Defendant did not obtain a letter of suspicion from the injured party, and taking into account the circumstances leading up to the commission of the crime, the method of prosecution, the circumstances after the crime, the Defendant’s age, and other various sentencing conditions in the records, such as the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.