beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.30 2016나2003100

물품대금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 18, 19 (including number 2; hereinafter the same shall apply) as to the cause of the claim and the overall purport of the pleadings as to witness D of the first instance trial, the plaintiff supplied the deceased E (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased") with 571,130,000 won over 33 times during the period from May 1, 2012 to September 13, 2012; the deceased was married with the deceased F, and was composed of the defendants, who were their children; the deceased was deceased on 11:30 on July 16, 2013; the deceased died on 10:50 on July 16, 2013; and the deceased died on 10:00 on July 15, 201; 30,000 won on the deceased; and 1:05,010 on the part of the deceased;

2. The Defendants asserted that the Defendants renounced inheritance of the deceased. As such, in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 1, the Defendants reported the waiver of inheritance of the deceased on Oct. 15, 2013, the Suwon District Court Sejong District Court Decision 2013Ddan570, and received a judgment to accept the said report on Feb. 4, 2014. According to the above facts of recognition, according to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants did not succeed to the deceased’s inheritance. Accordingly, the Defendants’ aforementioned assertion pointing this out has merit.

Therefore, the Defendants do not have the obligation to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid 00 U.S. dollars.

3. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion of absolute acceptance

(a) the following facts do not conflict between the Parties: