On October 30, 2006, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would have a victim D’s “E-produced job, but Fgrgrgrggrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrg

However, the above company was employing new employees through public bonds, and there was no plan to employ new employees at the same time, and even if the defendant or F received money from the victim because there was no relationship with the above company's personnel management authority, the defendant or F did not have the intent or ability to find employment in the above company.

Nevertheless, as above, the Defendant deceiving the victim and received KRW 5,20,000 from the victim's above time and time and received KRW 5,20,000 from the above time and time to December 11, 2008, by deceiving the victim D, victim G, victim H, and victim I in the above manner, and by deceiving the victim's victim's identity, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant, G, H, D, and I;

1. Partial statement of F;

1. Detailed statement of transactions;

1. A report on investigation (verification of check numbers);

1. Copy of a note and passbook;

1. Investigation reports and details of transactions;

1. A report, receipt, etc. of investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a copy of passbook;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of the concurrent offenders, the crime of this case is not committed for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (a concurrent crimes with the punishment stipulated in the crime of fraud against victims D with the largest amount of crime) among the concurrent crimes. The crime of this case is committed by the defendant, as a church house, by taking the name of F wood company as a member of a church and taking job placement services into account several times, by taking over 16,200,000 won in total under the pretext of job placement training expenses, etc., and all victims want to be punished by the defendant.