However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 28, 2016, around 4:50 around 4:50, the Defendant prepared and opened the entrance of the victim D (Woo, 43 years old) located in Yansan-si C in front of the telecom, and opened the entrance door one time to be used as a dangerous object, and then installed the entrance from the damaged person.

When receiving a complaint, “the victim’s head was taken once due to the above use, and the victim suffered injury to the victim, such as the impairment of 2 feet which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F or D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 268-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of amount of punishment (including the fact that a defendant who has no record of punishment heavier than a fine has divided his/her mistake and agreed to do so smoothly with a victim, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( repeatedly considered for the foregoing reason);

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;