beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.02.19 2012가합39702

판결문공시 등

Text

1. The Defendants each of the Plaintiff A Litigation Group, Plaintiff B, and each of them was KRW 3,00,000,000 and the Defendants’ respective of them from December 5, 2011 to February 5, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s council of occupants’ representatives, the establishment of the litigation group, and the conclusion of the instant delegation contract with the Plaintiff B) G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”).

) On January 29, 1996, after obtaining a building permit from the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office pursuant to Article 8 of the Building Act, the F main complex building (the total of 414 households and the total of 18 households in apartment, the total of 432 households in commercial buildings; hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”) on the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E and H ground.

A) A new construction of the apartment of this case, which had undergone a completion inspection on November 25, 2004, and thereafter sold 305 households out of 414 apartment units to the general public. 2) A sectional owner or lessee of the apartment of this case began to move in from December 2004. A part of the occupants of the apartment of this case opened a car page called “F” in the Internet evaded site “N” in order to resolve the complaints of the occupants against G and I (hereinafter “I”) about December 22, 2004. By February 27, 2005, 135 occupants were admitted as members of the above car page.

On February 24, 2005, the members of the above car page held 70 persons among the members and elected 14 persons, such as J, as members of the F Apartment Temporary Resident Representatives' Association, and followed the same year.

3. 3. At a general meeting of occupants, two vice-chairpersons, management directors and general secretary-general, six directors, and 13 representatives of each group of households (based on the last number of each number of households, were divided into 10 Ra), such as by holding a general meeting of occupants and selecting the J as the president, etc., which led the council of occupants' representatives of the Plaintiff.

3) The Plaintiff’s council of occupants’ representatives is the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings (hereinafter “Aggregate Buildings Act”).

In accordance with the management rules on the use, etc. of the instant apartment (A evidence 1; hereinafter “instant management rules”)

After making up for this case’s management rules, the written consent of 225 households of the apartment of this case from March 2005 is required.