성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;
2. 9,344,00 won shall be collected from the defendant.
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Punishment of Acts, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic;
A. The Defendant, in collusion with pro-dong D and type E, intended to operate a commercial entertainment business establishment in the trade name of “G”, by leasing three floors of the building located in Gwangju Northern-gu F, and the Defendant supplied or managed female employees, supplied with KRW 12 million with the initial fund, and provided customers with H who are employees, and provided them with pre-contract telephone or information at a business establishment, and provided them with KRW 40 million with the initial fund, and the profits from the business establishment are divided by Defendant, D, and E with 1/3.
In accordance with the above public offering, E and D supplied each of the above early funds, and the Defendant employed female employees I, J, K, etc. through Brokis on December 2015, and D received 70,000 won or KRW 100,000 from a person who was on the part of his/her name in the above business establishment to February 15, 2016, in accordance with the course from a person who was not on the part of his/her own name, and gave guidance to the relevant female employees, and let them do sexual intercourse with the customer, and the Defendant managed and distributed the income received as above.
B. The Defendant, in collusion with D and E, controlled the crime as set forth in the above paragraph (a) and came to undergo an investigation and a trial as the owner of the business, employed L on behalf of H, and continued to operate the said business. From May 2016 to July 28, 2016, D in the above manner received KRW 70,000 or KRW 100,00 from the non-personal customers in accordance with the course of study and provided guidance to the relevant female employees, and led them to perform sexual intercourse with the customer, and the Defendant managed and managed the work of female employees.
Accordingly, the defendant conspiredd with D and E to arrange sexual traffic.
2. The Defendant also tried to exempt the offender from being punished for the fact that he operated the said establishment when operating “G” as described in the foregoing A, and was controlled by the police around February 15, 2016.