However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On April 27, 2013, between around 00:00 and around 01:00, the Defendants jointly set up and set up a victim on the side of the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City EF convenience store for the following reasons: (a) the victim G (the victim 16 years of age, south) was frightening in tobacco; and (b) the victim “I want to see whether I fright, fright, and she will die,” and (c) the Defendant “I fright to fright to fright, fright, and her face” means “I fright to fright, and fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to f.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Suspension of execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of each of the Defendants;

1. Probation and community service order: Defendants’ respective criminal offenses under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (i.e., self-defination, the absence of any particular criminal record, deposits, etc